Consult the panel

Guides

Which Colleges Ban AI Help on Essays?

August 10, 2026 · 5 min read

Of the 115 schools whose admissions pages we have checked, four publish a policy that bars AI help on application essays outright: Brown University, Villanova University, Brigham Young University, Claremont McKenna College. Every other school we checked either permits feedback on writing you did yourself, or publishes no AI-specific rule at all.

That is a narrower answer than the question usually assumes. Most schools with a published policy are not banning AI; they are banning AI-written text, which is a different rule with a different line. Both are below, quoted from the schools themselves.

The schools that prohibit it

These are the entries whose own words rule out AI involvement with application content, feedback included. Each quote is taken from the school’s published page on the date shown.

Brown University

Prohibits AI for application content except basic spelling and grammar review; that excludes essay feedback

Brown affirms this definition and reiterates our own independent policy that the use of artificial intelligence by an applicant is not permitted under any circumstances in conjunction with application content. While an applicant may use artificial intelligence to assist with spelling and grammar review, in the same way as any other platform that supports basic proofreading, the content of all essays, short-answer questions and any other material submitted by an applicant must be the work of that individual.

Verified August 4, 2026 · source · Brown University AI essay policy

Villanova University

Writing supplements must be unaided by AI, which prohibits AI feedback on Villanova supplemental essays

The Admission Committee expects that each writing supplement be the original work of the applicant, unaided by artificial intelligence. Those found to be submitting writing that is not their own may be denied or have their admission rescinded.

Verified August 9, 2026 · source · Villanova University AI essay policy

Brigham Young University

Bars generative AI while composing application responses; permits human readers only

You may not pay anyone to help you with your application, and you may not use generative AI tools (like ChatGPT) as you compose your responses. We use software tools to analyze the admission essays and activity responses of all students. We may rescind the admission offer of any student whose essay is found to have been generated by AI or otherwise plagiarized.

Verified August 10, 2026 · source · Brigham Young University AI essay policy

Claremont McKenna College

Limits AI to basic proofreading (grammar, punctuation, spelling); the essay must be written by the applicant

If you choose to use AI, it should be limited to basic proofreading, such as correcting grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors.

Verified August 11, 2026 · source · Claremont McKenna College AI essay policy

A note on how we read these. Where a school’s wording is ambiguous, we take the stricter reading. Brigham Young University, for example, grants an explicit review carve-out to people and extends no equivalent to AI, so we treat it as a prohibition even though a narrower reading is arguable. Being wrong in the other direction costs a student their offer.

What most published policies actually say

29 of the schools with a verified policy permit AI in some form while prohibiting AI-written or AI-revised text. The line they draw is about authorship: who produced the words you submit. Feedback on an essay you wrote sits on the permitted side of it.

The largest group publishes nothing

79 of the 115 schools we checked publish no AI-specific policy for application essays, and 3 have a rule that is reported but not published anywhere we can verify. That is the honest state of things as of August 11, 2026, and it is worth saying plainly rather than filling the gap with a guess.

Silence is not permission. With no published rule, the Common App’s own fraud policy and the school’s general integrity expectations still apply: the essay must be your own work. Getting feedback that leaves you the author is a different act from submitting text you did not write, but where a school has stated nothing, that distinction is yours to make and yours to verify.

How to check your own school

Every school we have checked has a page of its own, including the ones that publish nothing, so you can see the quote and the date rather than take our word for it. Start at the policy directory, or search your school by name.

If your school is not listed, look for “artificial intelligence” on its admissions FAQ, its application instructions, and its writing-supplement page, in that order. Those three places hold nearly every policy we found. Policies change between cycles, so confirm before you rely on anything here.

Where this leaves you

If you are applying to one of the four schools above, do not run your essay through any AI tool, ours included. CollegeEssayPanel stops a review before the panel reads your essay when you name one of them as a target school, and returns your credit.

For everyone else, the safe version of AI help is the version that leaves you the author: feedback, questions, and revision directions on writing that is already yours. That is a rule you can follow at a school with no published policy and still be able to defend what you submitted.

College Essay Panel is not affiliated with any college, university, admissions office, testing organization, or application platform. Admissions practices vary by school and change over time; confirm details with each college directly.

All articles · Guides · Blog · School AI policies · Contact · Home